Jump to content


missing slipstream entries in apm files


1 reply to this topic

#1 icnocop

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 25 posts

Posted 24 December 2008 - 12:45 PM

Hi.

I found the following apm files (excluding Tweaks) that are missing slipstream entries.

I am wondering which ones can be slipstreamed\integrated, and if so, what is the correct syntax, or which components do not support slipstreaming at all.

I am also wondering if the slipstream section for these apm files are being worked on by the autopatcher developers and may be included in future releases?

These apm files are from the WinXP SP3 x86 release and DotNet Addon

Thank you.

modules\Components\IE7_xp_x86_enu.apm
modules\Components\JournalViewer_x86_enu.apm
modules\Components\UserProfileHiveCleanup_enu.apm
modules\Components\WindowsDefender_x86_enu.apm
modules\Components\WindowsUpdateAgent_x86_788.apm
modules\Components\winmsgr_x86_enu.apm
modules\Components\WMP11_xp_x86_enu.apm
modules\Components\__dotnet\dotnet2.0sp1_x86.apm
modules\Components\__dotnet\dotnet3.5.apm
modules\Critical\KB890830_x86_204.apm
modules\Critical\KB923789_xp_x86_enu.apm
modules\Critical\KB928366_DN11SP1_x86_enu.apm
modules\Critical\KB931906_x86_enu.apm
modules\Critical\RootCerts_0811.apm
modules\NonCritical\euFontUpdate_enu.apm
modules\NonCritical\KB907306_enu.apm
modules\NonCritical\KB925168_DN11SP1_x86_enu.apm

#2 Cristiano

    Super Helpful Guy

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,851 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brazil (Santa Maria - RS)

Posted 24 December 2008 - 01:29 PM

not missing, those don't have slipstream mode that autopatcher can handle and also slipstream for those aren't officially supported. just run the files with an /? and you will see that those doesn't have any command to that. yes, you may say that nlite can do that, but this is autopatcher, not nlite. even for wmp11, you have to hack the file with a tool, in violation of ms agreement, in order to be able to slipstream it. and, for some of the files that you have listed, even nlite can't handle to slipstream

so, basically, is nlite wishes violate ms agreements, it's their problem

[]s





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users