3 replies to this topic

[Cyrus]

When downloading only the English XP 2.6 script, I get a run-time error on update as soon as the download for WindowsUpdateAgent30-x86 finishes. (Well what do you know, Windows Update causing problems, isn't that why we are here in the first place?) I took a look at the x86 script and the corresponding .apm file for the update but I didn't find anything obviously wrong. Here's the excerpt from the XP script:

Item=WindowsUpdateAgent30-x86.exe

DetectFile=autopatcher:\modules\Components\WindowsUpdate_x86_files\WindowsUpdateAgent30-x86.exe
DetectHash=5401F801A74EFA5CB8CA22FFFAD1CD8B
DownloadFrom=http://download.windowsupdate.com/WindowsUpdate/redist/standalone/7.0.6000.381/WindowsUpdateAgent30-x86.exe
DownloadTo=autopatcher:\modules\Components\WindowsUpdate_x86_files\WindowsUpdateAgent30-x86.exe
ExpectedSize=6136176
ExpectedHash=5401F801A74EFA5CB8CA22FFFAD1CD8B

Item=WindowsUpdate_x86_enu.apm

DetectFile=autopatcher:\modules\Components\WindowsUpdate_x86_enu.apm
DetectHash=828A9D3A2DB63B0E3D4CD5F209508EF6
DownloadFrom=http://www.autopatcher.com/releases/modules/WindowsUpdate_x86_enu.apm
DownloadTo=autopatcher:\modules\Components\WindowsUpdate_x86_enu.apm
ExpectedSize=1166
ExpectedHash=828A9D3A2DB63B0E3D4CD5F209508EF6

I suggest that if you can't quickly fix the problem, you should just remove this update from the list so that we have a working program.

[Rudy]

I've just created a clean install of the 2.6 beta, with no runtime error (0), but "one or more files failed verification. Do you want to continue".

The failed verification is a problem at the autopatcher server (according to Renato). The runtime error(0) occurred when you had version 2.4 beta install and download with the new beta 2.6. I've experienced this problem with 2.4 upgraded to 2.6 beta. See my bug list report. bug list report - version 2.6 beta

Edited by Rudy, 25 November 2007 - 06:49 AM.

[Cyrus]

Although I have no problem starting over (I have the bandwidth) this is a problem which Renato/Antonis needs to address before the final version.

[Rudy]

Cyrus, on Nov 25 2007, 07:37 PM, said:

Although I have no problem starting over (I have the bandwidth) this is a problem which Renato/Antonis needs to address before the final version.

I agree - i don't want to start all over again. Thats why I've the runtime error(0) still listed as a download bug