Jump to content


Windows Vista SP2 replaces those updates


10 replies to this topic

#1 Cristiano

    Super Helpful Guy

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,851 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brazil (Santa Maria - RS)

Posted 26 May 2009 - 01:11 PM

this list has about 15 pages, so all the kb numbers will be presented in codebox format. according to this file, sp2 has the following description:

Quote

Windows Server 2008 SP2 and Windows Vista SP2 includes all previously released updates since Windows Server 2008 and Windows Vista SP1. Many of these updates are available to the public on the Microsoft Download Center and Windows Update, while others are only available to specific customers or partners. It is standard practice to include all of these updates in a Service Pack and as such they are included in Service Pack 2.

This document contains a list of these updates with links to their descriptive webpage on http://support.microsoft.com. There are other updates in Service Pack 2 which have not released as updates and therefore are not presented in this list.

Disclaimer: This is a preliminary document and may be changed substantially prior to final commercial release of the software described herein, as newer hotfixes and security updates will continue to be included in the Service Pack until closer to the release date.

please, pay attention to this: Vista SP2 just have the updates that arrived after SP1, not before, meaning that yours will be required to have SP1 before install SP2

the replaced list:
Spoiler

[]s

Edited by Cristiano, 18 October 2010 - 11:29 AM.
spoiler


#2 Cristiano

    Super Helpful Guy

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,851 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brazil (Santa Maria - RS)

Posted 26 May 2009 - 02:37 PM

in a preliminary clean at vista x64 script, seems that 11 critical updates, 7 non-critical and 4 components remain for vista x64. in that clean, some orphan modules was found. due that, every single download will be re-checked for orphans as well and, after that, the remaining updates will be matched with the ones that was replaced by vista sp1, just to be sure that everything that was replaced is gone. it may take a few days

[]s

#3 Cristiano

    Super Helpful Guy

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,851 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brazil (Santa Maria - RS)

Posted 26 May 2009 - 04:46 PM

i've finished the preliminary check of the replacements. i've also found a couple of downloads without an module, that will be removed when the vista x64 sp2 script be released. so far, will remain only those updates:
critical:
KB929729
KB931906
KB960715
KB961260
KB890830
KB958690
KB960225
KB956572
KB960803
KB963027
KB959426

non-critical
KB907306
KB943790
KB952627
KB960544
euFontUpdate
KB969497
KB969058
KB905866 -> yes, i know that this one is listed also replaced, but there's 29 reasons why i believe that this was an mistake from ms put this one also replaced, unless they are thinking about not update this one anymore or at least are thinking about change the kb number. so, for safety, this one keeps in the write list for now.

components
KB940157
WindowsUpdate
IE8

this is only an preliminary research and some obsolete modules can be still listed. if someone is willing to double-check that, i will be grateful. also, the remain 2k8 only updates that still was being downloaded will be removed in the next vista x64 script update.

now, rest my eyes and find the release notes for vista sp1 and look for forgotten files into the script...

[]s

#4 excalibur

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 50 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London

Posted 31 May 2009 - 06:16 PM

To help in the SP2 Script...

There is an error in script(s) for KB963027 - Cumulative Security Update for Internet Explorer 7 (Vista x64)

Update file is removed and then downloaded again

Module						   Title
KB963027_2k8_x86.apm			 Cumulative Security Update for Internet Explorer 7 in Windows Server 2008 (KB963027)
KB963027_IE7_xp_x86_enu.apm	  Cumulative Security Update for Internet Explorer 7 for Windows XP (KB963027)
KB963027_vista_x86.apm		   Cumulative Security Update for Internet Explorer 7 in Windows Vista (KB963027)
KB963027_xp_x86_enu.apm		  Cumulative Security Update for Internet Explorer for Windows XP (KB963027)

In script autopatcher_vista_x64_SP2_beta.script

Line 26

PreAction=del "autopatcher:\modules\Critical\KB960803_vista_x64.apm_files\Windows6.0-KB963027-x64.msu"

APUp removes the duplicate file.

However...

In script autopatcher_vista_x64.script

Line 1182

Item=Windows6.0-KB963027-x64.msu

DetectFile=autopatcher:\modules\Critical\KB960803_vista_x64.apm_files\Windows6.0-KB963027-x64.msu
DetectHash=F85864BEA29ECDD07C7DDE51BA4E5013
DownloadFrom=http://download.microsoft.com/download/2/A/4/2A412C6B-B092-479D-8270-AF374CE6B443/Windows6.0-KB963027-x64.msu
DownloadTo=autopatcher:\modules\Critical\KB960803_vista_x64.apm_files\Windows6.0-KB963027-x64.msu
ExpectedSize=17836796
ExpectedHash=F85864BEA29ECDD07C7DDE51BA4E5013


Then re-downloads it.

BTW
Folder Critical\KB960803_vista_x64.apm_files contains two files:

Windows6.0-KB960803-x64.msu
Windows6.0-KB963027-x64.msu


When the above is fixed there should only be one:

Windows6.0-KB960803-x64.msu

E

#5 excalibur

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 50 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London

Posted 31 May 2009 - 06:19 PM

I have noticed there a few patches that get deleted in one script and then redownloaded by another.

I think a lot of time needs to be spent to check/compare the relevant scripts.

E

#6 _def_x_

    audi 5k

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,466 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 31 May 2009 - 08:39 PM

...autopatcher_vista_x64_SP2_beta.script
This looks correct to me,

PreAction=del "autopatcher:\modules\Critical\KB960803_vista_x64.apm_files\Windows6.0-KB963027-x64.msu"

"KB963027-x64.msu" is being removed from the "KB960803_vista_x64.apm_files" folder.

Also, both "KB960803-x64.msu" and "KB963027-x64.msu" and the associated apm files are being downloaded to the proper
locations - as far as I can tell.

...autopatcher_vista_x64.script
This needs fixing, Wrong Folder

Item=Windows6.0-KB963027-x64.msu

DetectFile=autopatcher:\modules\Critical\KB960803_vista_x64.apm_files\Windows6.0-KB963027-x64.msu
DownloadTo=autopatcher:\modules\Critical\KB960803_vista_x64.apm_files\Windows6.0-KB963027-x64.msu

.........................................................
...autopatcher_vista_x64.script edit

PreAction=del "autopatcher:\modules\Critical\KB960803_vista_x64.apm_files\Windows6.0-KB963027-x64.msu"


Item=Windows6.0-KB963027-x64.msu

DetectFile=autopatcher:\modules\Critical\KB963027_vista_x64.apm_files\Windows6.0-KB963027-x64.msu
DetectHash=F85864BEA29ECDD07C7DDE51BA4E5013
DownloadFrom=http://download.microsoft.com/download/2/A/4/2A412C6B-B092-479D-8270-AF374CE6B443/Windows6.0-KB963027-x64.msu
DownloadTo=autopatcher:\modules\Critical\KB963027_vista_x64.apm_files\Windows6.0-KB963027-x64.msu
ExpectedSize=17836796
ExpectedHash=F85864BEA29ECDD07C7DDE51BA4E5013

FIXED 2:20 PM PST

#7 Cristiano

    Super Helpful Guy

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,851 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brazil (Santa Maria - RS)

Posted 01 June 2009 - 01:19 AM

> "KB963027-x64.msu" is being removed from the "KB960803_vista_x64.apm_files" folder.
that was the right behavior. the script was wrong a few weeks ago and it was downloading that file in the wrong location. so, to fix this issue, that could lead to an unofficial version, that command should be like that.

but thanks to fix those issues

[]s

#8 _def_x_

    audi 5k

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,466 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 01 June 2009 - 03:01 AM

Sorry, I didn't know autopatcher_vista_x64.script was getting signed, I won't touch it next time.

Also, I did not edit autopatcher_vista_x64_SP2_beta.script.

These are the Item= lines I checked in the autopatcher_vista_x64.script
I did not change the download order, just fixed the file / folder issues. I left the Item=Windows-KBxxxxxx inplace.
# May 31, 2009 gUiTaR_mIkE
PreAction=del "autopatcher:\modules\Critical\KB960225_vista_x64.apm_files\Windows6.0-KB956572-x64.msu"
PreAction=del "autopatcher:\modules\Critical\KB960225_vista_x64.apm_files\Windows6.0-KB958690-x64.msu"
PreAction=del "autopatcher:\modules\Critical\KB960803_vista_x64.apm_files\Windows6.0-KB963027-x64.msu"

Item=Windows6.0-KB958690-x64.msu

Item=Windows6.0-KB960225-x64.msu

Item=Windows6.0-KB956572-x64.msu

Item=Windows6.0-KB960803-x64.msu

Item=Windows6.0-KB963027-x64.msu


Followup: According to the rti file this release (AutoPatcher for Windows Vista SP1/2008 (x64)) was signed on December 11, 2008 by Erik

#9 Cristiano

    Super Helpful Guy

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,851 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brazil (Santa Maria - RS)

Posted 01 June 2009 - 10:59 AM

> autopatcher_vista_x64.script was getting signed
and it isn't signed. i have no way to do install tests for those modules and most of people didn't even noticed that this script had orphan files since several months ago. some was modules, some was the updates. i've talked that with domenico about that when i was doing the sp2 clean. but doesn't matter if the script is signed today or not. someday, it will be, by someone. then, this someone will be crazy because certain people are unable to get an official release and will just say an: download it again. in fact, it will solve the problem, but an fix for an mistake that last a few days doesn't hurt.

> Windows Vista SP1/2008 (x64)) was signed on December 11, 2008 by Erik
and that is right. at the end of the script, the download for the .rti file is set also an comment, because there's no point in download an file that is useless, unless if that file is updated. and, personally, i only will sign the scripts that i can test

[]s

#10 _def_x_

    audi 5k

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,466 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 13 September 2010 - 09:11 AM

@chrisadam11

I Smell Spam!



#11 Cristiano

    Super Helpful Guy

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,851 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brazil (Santa Maria - RS)

Posted 13 September 2010 - 10:29 AM

me too

gone for good

[]s





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users