Jump to content


**Working** Dotnet Addon Pack Coming Soon


41 replies to this topic

#21 JRosenfeld

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 107 posts

Posted 13 December 2007 - 11:45 PM

Fine here. No errors.

#22 Erik Ramey

    AutoPatcher Elite

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 766 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Washington State

Posted 13 December 2007 - 11:51 PM

View PostCyrus, on Dec 13 2007, 02:46 PM, said:

Not on my computers, they (I tested it on several) still get the same MD5 error as before.
What are the MD5's of the files that are reporting errors?

#23 StanTheMan

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 43 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 14 December 2007 - 05:47 AM

View PostErik Ramey, on Dec 14 2007, 01:51 AM, said:

What are the MD5's of the files that are reporting errors?

Yip, i am also still getting the file verification error:

Looking for file C:\apup\modules\Components\__dotnet\dotnet3.5_enu.apm
MD5 Hashes do NOT match. Expecting 89205a7b98b191a1d46c21ca5d20cfc9, but found 19bfd0c211fd85be41bdcab0910c3aae!!!

#24 Erik Ramey

    AutoPatcher Elite

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 766 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Washington State

Posted 14 December 2007 - 05:53 AM

Okay, I see what happened. I accidently added to MD5's when I last corrected it. Fixed

Thanks Stan!

#25 StanTheMan

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 43 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 14 December 2007 - 06:03 AM

View PostErik Ramey, on Dec 14 2007, 07:53 AM, said:

Okay, I see what happened. I accidently added to MD5's when I last corrected it. Fixed

Thanks Stan!

Thanks Erik!

I still have the same error, but i'll wait a while and try it again later, maybe the incorrect script is still being
cached somewhere on my side.

Thanks.

#26 Erik Ramey

    AutoPatcher Elite

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 766 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Washington State

Posted 14 December 2007 - 06:12 AM

Quite odd... I just tested with the old script that was incorrect which APUP didn't delete. Once I deleted it manually, the newest one was download. I then copied the bad one back and this time APUP deleted like it was suppose to.

Check this for me Stan:
The bad one contains this below in the modules portion of the script:
DetectFile=autopatcher:\modules\Components\__dotnet\dotnet3.5_enu.apm
DetectHash=19BFD0C211FD85BE41BDCAB0910C3AAE
DetectHash=89205a7b98b191a1d46c21ca5d20cfc9

While the good one has only this:
DetectFile=autopatcher:\modules\Components\__dotnet\dotnet3.5_enu.apm
DetectHash=19BFD0C211FD85BE41BDCAB0910C3AAE

Do you still have the bad version of the script?

#27 StanTheMan

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 43 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 14 December 2007 - 11:59 AM

View PostErik Ramey, on Dec 14 2007, 08:12 AM, said:

Quite odd... I just tested with the old script that was incorrect which APUP didn't delete. Once I deleted it manually, the newest one was download. I then copied the bad one back and this time APUP deleted like it was suppose to.

Check this for me Stan:
The bad one contains this below in the modules portion of the script:
DetectFile=autopatcher:\modules\Components\__dotnet\dotnet3.5_enu.apm
DetectHash=19BFD0C211FD85BE41BDCAB0910C3AAE
DetectHash=89205a7b98b191a1d46c21ca5d20cfc9

While the good one has only this:
DetectFile=autopatcher:\modules\Components\__dotnet\dotnet3.5_enu.apm
DetectHash=19BFD0C211FD85BE41BDCAB0910C3AAE

Do you still have the bad version of the script?

Hi again Erik,
Sorry i have been out all day.

Ok here is a clean copy of the problem log:

DetectFile=autopatcher:\modules\Components\__dotnet\dotnet3.5_enu.apm
DetectHash=19BFD0C211FD85BE41BDCAB0910C3AAE
DetectHash=89205a7b98b191a1d46c21ca5d20cfc9

Notice it still has two copies of the Hashes!

Very strange as i deleted ALL the scripts and reran apup only selecting "Dotnet Add on pack for Windows"
And then it gives me that file verification error!

Strange?

Stan

#28 sh1leshk4

    Using AP since...then. =b

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 116 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 14 December 2007 - 02:06 PM

Yes...it's strange indeed...since I just downloaded the .NET add-on and everything went fine.
Is it probably because you're (somehow) connected to a proxy that caches downloads?

Edited by sh1leshk4, 14 December 2007 - 02:06 PM.


#29 StanTheMan

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 43 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 14 December 2007 - 02:57 PM

View Postsh1leshk4, on Dec 14 2007, 04:06 PM, said:

Yes...it's strange indeed...since I just downloaded the .NET add-on and everything went fine.
Is it probably because you're (somehow) connected to a proxy that caches downloads?


Well thats what i was thinking :lol:

But i have a direct dsl connection to the internet ??

Strange?

I dont even think deleting all the dotnet files and re downloading them will help?

Stan.

#30 sh1leshk4

    Using AP since...then. =b

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 116 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 14 December 2007 - 03:25 PM

Mmm...I think it's the downloaded script file that has the problem, not the downloaded .NET file.
Try deleting all .list and .script files in your AP folder first.

#31 StanTheMan

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 43 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 14 December 2007 - 03:53 PM

View Postsh1leshk4, on Dec 14 2007, 05:25 PM, said:

Mmm...I think it's the downloaded script file that has the problem, not the downloaded .NET file.
Try deleting all .list and .script files in your AP folder first.


Allready tried that a few times!
Its still bringing down the wrong file.
I'll try again later!

Thanks,

Stan

#32 Cyrus

    AutoPatcher Expert

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 254 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 15 December 2007 - 06:14 AM

It worked fine for me this time.

#33 StanTheMan

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 43 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 15 December 2007 - 06:26 AM

Yip! worked fine for me now too :D

Must be a cache problem of some sorts.

Thanks guys!

Stan.

#34 BrainDedd

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 22 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 10 January 2008 - 01:32 PM

Any chance of changing Dotnet 2.0 SP1 to show for windows xp as well, since it's there and all.

#35 Erik Ramey

    AutoPatcher Elite

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 766 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Washington State

Posted 10 January 2008 - 03:59 PM

View PostBrainDedd, on Jan 10 2008, 05:32 AM, said:

Any chance of changing Dotnet 2.0 SP1 to show for windows xp as well, since it's there and all.
Dotnet 2.0 SP1 isn't required for Windows XP since Dotnet 3.5 already includes this.

#36 BrainDedd

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 22 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 12 January 2008 - 10:21 AM

OK I just figured for people like me that don't have or want dotnet 3.0+ on since there's nothing out there that really uses it, that having it as an option was maybe a good idea.

#37 James

    Advanced Member

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,212 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:UK

Posted 12 January 2008 - 10:29 AM

View PostBrainDedd, on Jan 12 2008, 10:21 AM, said:

OK I just figured for people like me that don't have or want dotnet 3.0+ on...

That would include me, too...
--
James

#38 DesertJerry

    AutoPatcher Elite

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 985 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Victorville, California

Posted 15 January 2008 - 10:38 PM

Will the update include: ParallelExtensionsToNetFramework35_Dec07CTP.msi

and/or PowerToysForNETCompactFramework35.msi

Just wondering?

#39 Erik Ramey

    AutoPatcher Elite

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 766 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Washington State

Posted 16 January 2008 - 01:23 AM

@'DesertJerry - Honestly I haven't looked into this. Is this something that the average user will need? Well.. the average person that uses dotnet will need...

#40 sh1leshk4

    Using AP since...then. =b

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 116 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 16 January 2008 - 07:49 AM

I don't think it should be included.
The .NET pack is supposed to make any .NET apps work, not to help the average user to create one.

Just my $0.02. =)





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users