Jump to content


Files not marked as installed


16 replies to this topic

#1 drspangle

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 6 posts

Posted 05 September 2010 - 07:05 AM

I have used autopatcher for quite some time and would first like to extend my thanks to the people who create and maintain it. I really appreciate having a program like this.

Recently I have noticed that two updates are never marked as installed no matter how many times I install them. They are:
Cumulative Time Zone Update for Windows XP (KB955839)
Windows Update Agent v7.2.6001.788

I deleted the install files and redownloaded them using apup but nothing changed.

I should mention that even before this for some months Autopatcher for Windows XP SP3 (x86) has been listed as not official, but I don't know why. I have never edited the contents of the apup folder before today.

Any help is appreciated.

#2 _def_x_

    audi 5k

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,466 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 05 September 2010 - 08:46 AM

Welcome drspangle :)

Just for kicks, fire up AutoPatcher first, click 'About' - click 'Release Info', what is the 'Date' of your AutoPatcher XP x86 release, the latest Official release is August 26, 2010? Btw, are there other releases in with the XP package? The release 'Title' in RED needs attention.

It sounds as if you haven't updated your XP x86 release in a while, it is a good idea to update at least twice a month, you run APUP to collect new files and get rid of old ones - it looks as if you have a couple.

Windows Update Agent is at 7.4.7600.226 (KB949104) /// (KB955839) looks to have been removed ages ago, I can't find KB955839 in any script, going as far back as May 2010.

What I would do:

...Windows Update Agent - delete the executable (WindowsUpdateAgent30-x86.exe) in the folder and delete the associated .apm file (WindowsUpdateAgent_x86.apm) from the '\Components' directory.

...Cumulative Time Zone Update (KB955839) - delete the folder and the associated .apm file for Time Zone Update KB955839.

...Run APUP, select the 'XP_SP3_x86' script to update your release. I would run APUP a few times, the second time to clean the log file. If you still have an Unofficial release, run the .md5 file and scan your folder - please report what the log file shows and any errors the .md5 discovers.

Also, what is the date of the script you are retrieving, the latest is autopatcher_xp_sp3_enu_20100826.script? I know you stated you have done the deleting and redownloading but you should be getting a newer version WUA???

Edited by gUiTaR_mIkE, 05 September 2010 - 08:52 AM.


#3 drspangle

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 6 posts

Posted 05 September 2010 - 09:37 AM

Thanks for the quick response. I deleted the files like you said and those entries disappeared. I guess apup should have deleted them but didn't for some reason.

I've run apup a few times and am still unofficial. I don't have that .script file you mentioned, although the log file shows "english/win_xp/autopatcher_xp_sp3_enu_20100826.script" as having been picked.

The closest thing I have is autopatcher_xp_x86_enu.script, created 2008/08/07 and modified 2008/09/03. The Release Info tab in autopatcher gives September 10, 2008 as the date for Autopatcher for Windows XP.

#4 _def_x_

    audi 5k

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,466 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 05 September 2010 - 10:22 AM

I'm not exactly sure we are on the same page just yet. If you wait too long between updates a removal command that was once present in the script may be removed - the assumption made is the user updates regularly. Like I said, I went back to May and cant find KB955839 which means you must have had a really old release to have missed this removal unless this update was in another package - not sure. :unsure:

About the script, I didn't mean you had it locally on your computer, rather, what was APUP retrieving when getting the 'releases.list' file - it looks like you are getting the latest script -> August 26, 2010. What exaclty do you mean by - The closest thing I have is autopatcher_xp_x86_enu.script, created 2008/08/07 and modified 2008/09/03 - and what exactly are you doing with these scripts, they are extremely old, why are you saving them? You can save them (no big deal) just wondering what you're plans are for them?

You failed to answer a few important questions...
...Are there other releases in with the XP package?
...What is the 'Date' of your AutoPatcher XP x86 release - not AutoPatcher Engine?
...Please report what the log file shows and any errors the .md5 discovers.

See the attached image for an example of what I'm looking for in questions 1 and 2 - the 'Release Info' screen. Also, what is the version of AutoPatcher you are using, it can be seen from the same window listed as 'Program version:'?

Also, did you run the .md5 file located in the root folder (with apup.exe), what did the md5sum file report, if nothing (no errors), your Unofficial status is likely due to more stray files in your release.

#5 drspangle

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 6 posts

Posted 05 September 2010 - 11:44 AM

I see, I didn't realize apup wouldn't delete files that were that old. There were times in the past where I didn't run apup for a while so some older files could still be there.

I've never manually downloaded any script files, they have just been in the folder. I've also attached a screenshot of the release info window.

I used a program called md5summer on the file md5_checksum_for_AutoPatcher_XP_ENU.md5 and it had no errors. The apup log also had no errors.

Attached Files

  • Attached File  ap.PNG   44.92K   4 downloads

Edited by drspangle, 05 September 2010 - 11:49 AM.


#6 _def_x_

    audi 5k

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,466 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 05 September 2010 - 12:11 PM

OK, I think I see one issue.

If you look closely at your screenshot you will see 2 instances of XP SP3 x86, including Erik Ramey's, I think you may simply have to remove the .rti file from the root folder (the folder where apup.exe is). Everything else seems OK.

So, you need to find the .rti file that Erik Ramey used to make his release (XP from 2008) Official and remove it. You don't need to remove any of the other .rti files only the one that has xp_sp3_x86 (or some derivation of) in the name. Cristiano's .rti file is named like this -> xp_sp3_enu.rti. Don't worry if you remove Cristiano's file as well, when you delete the offender rerun APUP and select the XP SP3 x86 script to clean up the release. Then check to see if things are Official.

There is the distinct possibility you will still be Unofficial because there may be other files left behind from this old release.

Btw, you have many releases in one folder so keep them updated and always check the 'Release Info' window if you aren't sure what release is making the whole package Unofficial.

OK, find and delete that .rti file and report back, I'll be waiting :)

#7 _def_x_

    audi 5k

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,466 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 05 September 2010 - 01:12 PM

drspangle said:

I've never manually downloaded any script files, they have just been in the folder.
Where are they located, in the root folder with apup.exe or another folder? You can delete these .script files regardless, you don't need them.

If you continue to have problems, you will need to create a .md5sum of your whole AutoPatcher release, we will then run it against a release with the same packages. What this will do is flag files missing at our end which will be the extras at your end - these will be the files causing the release to become Unofficial.

If you do create the .md5, put it in a .zip archive and attach it to your post.

#8 drspangle

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 6 posts

Posted 05 September 2010 - 01:17 PM

Thanks, I removed that file, and now all releases are marked as "true" under the "official" part of the Release Info tab. However, autopatcher is still unofficial. I guess there must be some old files in there somewhere.

How do you suggest I go about finding them? How does the program determine which files are supposed to be there? I tried removing and redownloading (using apup) all .apm files, but this didn't help.

Edit: oops, started my reply before your last post. wait just a minute

Edited by drspangle, 05 September 2010 - 01:20 PM.


#9 drspangle

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 6 posts

Posted 05 September 2010 - 01:39 PM

I can't seem to open the "full editor" when editing a post (I assume that is how I attach a file while editing) so I had to make another post to attach this md5 of my apup folder.

Attached Files



#10 _def_x_

    audi 5k

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,466 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 05 September 2010 - 01:39 PM

The simple way is to delete everything and start fresh. You could delete the '\modules' folder (the updates are located here, including the strays causing your release to fail), run APUP, and select all the same releases you have now, XP SP3 English, Adobe Reader, DirectX, DotNet, Extras, Java etc. This is OK if you have a fast connection, we don't all have highspeed.

If the above isn't practical, create the .md5 like I mentioned above, scanning all of the '\modules' folder, zip it up, we will try to create the exact package and then run your .md5 file. The files should be flagged as missing at our end - these are your extras (strays) - they need to be removed. It is tedious but works.

The .rti file is a md5sum if you will, it expects to find only the files present when the file was created for that particular release. If the 'Title' is True but AutoPatcher displays Unofficial, you have extras somewhere. If the 'Title' is RED, you are missing files in that particular release, in this case usually running APUP and updating the problem release works.

#11 _def_x_

    audi 5k

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,466 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 05 September 2010 - 01:42 PM

OK, this will take some time, the only Addon I don't have is Adobe Reader, I can check the script to see what files are needed. See you in a bit :)

#12 Cristiano

    Super Helpful Guy

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,851 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brazil (Santa Maria - RS)

Posted 05 September 2010 - 02:57 PM

in here, didn't matched:
APUP_BIN_old\7ZA.EXE
APUP_BIN_old\AAMD532.DLL
APUP_BIN_old\CAPCAB.EXE
APUP_BIN_old\Mscomctl.ocx
APUP_BIN_old\Mswinsck.ocx
MODULES\AddOns\NetworkMonitor.apm_files\NM33_x86.exe
MODULES\AddOns\SunJava_x86_files\jre-6u18-windows-i586-s.exe.old
MODULES\AddOns\SunJava_x86_files\jre-6u21-windows-i586.exe
MODULES\Critical\KB890830_files\windows-kb890830-v2.13.exe
MODULES\Critical\KB942763_xp_x86_enu.apm_files\WindowsXP-KB942763-x86-ENU.exe
MODULES\Critical\__MSIE_critical\KB960859_xp_x86_enu.apm_files\WindowsXP-KB960859-x86-ENU.exe
MODULES\Critical\__WMP_critical\KB968816_xp_x86_enu.apm_files\WindowsXP-WindowsMedia-KB968816-x86-ENU.exe
MODULES\Critical\__WMP_critical\KB973540_xp_wmp_x86_enu.apm_files\WindowsXP-WindowsMedia-KB973540-x86-ENU.exe
MODULES\NonCritical\KB972636_ie8_xp_x86_enu.apm_files\IE8-WindowsXP-KB972636-x86-ENU.exe
MODULES\NonCritical\__WMP_noncritical\WMP10\KB895181_wmp_enu.apm_files\windowsmedia-kb895181-x86-enu.exe
MODULES\NonCritical\__WMP_noncritical\WMP10\KB895181_xp_wmp10_x86_enu.apm
MODULES\stand_alone\AdbeRdrUpd933_all_incr.apm
apengine.script
apup.exe.old
apup.ini
apup.log
apup.script
autopatcher_addons.script
autopatcher_directx.script
autopatcher_xp_x86_enu.script
hit_this_to_generate_a_log_file_for_apup.cmd.old
java_jre.rti.old
java_jre_x86.rti
LIST.TXT
md5_checksum_for_AutoPatcher_XP_ENU.md5
md5_checksum_for_DirectX_Addon_Pack.md5
md5_checksum_for_DotNet_Addon_Pack.md5
md5_checksum_for_Extras_Addon_Pack.md5
md5_checksum_for_Java_Addon_Pack.md5
releases.list
xp_x86_enu.rti.old

from those, this ones must be removed:
MODULES\AddOns\NetworkMonitor.apm_files\NM33_x86.exe
MODULES\AddOns\SunJava_x86_files\jre-6u18-windows-i586-s.exe.old
MODULES\Critical\KB890830_files\windows-kb890830-v2.13.exe
MODULES\Critical\KB942763_xp_x86_enu.apm_files\WindowsXP-KB942763-x86-ENU.exe
MODULES\Critical\__MSIE_critical\KB960859_xp_x86_enu.apm_files\WindowsXP-KB960859-x86-ENU.exe
MODULES\Critical\__WMP_critical\KB968816_xp_x86_enu.apm_files\WindowsXP-WindowsMedia-KB968816-x86-ENU.exe
MODULES\Critical\__WMP_critical\KB973540_xp_wmp_x86_enu.apm_files\WindowsXP-WindowsMedia-KB973540-x86-ENU.exe
MODULES\NonCritical\KB972636_ie8_xp_x86_enu.apm_files\IE8-WindowsXP-KB972636-x86-ENU.exe
MODULES\NonCritical\__WMP_noncritical\WMP10\KB895181_wmp_enu.apm_files\windowsmedia-kb895181-x86-enu.exe
MODULES\NonCritical\__WMP_noncritical\WMP10\KB895181_xp_wmp10_x86_enu.apm

after that, this issue shall be solved, but this must be checked

[]s

#13 drspangle

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 6 posts

Posted 05 September 2010 - 03:45 PM

Thanks a lot, I deleted those files and now have an "official release". It was really nice of you to help.

It's sort of funny, for a long time I thought there was no official release yet and that everyone's was "unofficial/unsupported".

#14 _def_x_

    audi 5k

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,466 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 05 September 2010 - 03:48 PM

what a waste of my F'ing time that was

Edited by gUiTaR_mIkE, 05 September 2010 - 03:50 PM.


#15 Cristiano

    Super Helpful Guy

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,851 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brazil (Santa Maria - RS)

Posted 05 September 2010 - 07:08 PM

my intention was only help, mike. sorry about any trouble

[]s

#16 _def_x_

    audi 5k

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,466 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 06 September 2010 - 04:42 AM

Cristiano said:

my intention was only help, mike. sorry about any trouble
No Problem. I was annoyed, I got called away from this and nagged for an hour, I come back and you stole the thunder. The important thing is the OP fixed the Unofficial status. I might add that if the Op's md5 tool is renaming files, adding .old - this should be fixed in the tool's 'Preferences' otherwise there will be more strays to hunt down.

Also, if it was me I would get rid of - \APUP_BIN_old - not exactly sure what renamed this folder either :unsure: There's more crap in the \root folder but if the OP don't mind, who am I to say differently :)

#17 Cristiano

    Super Helpful Guy

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,851 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brazil (Santa Maria - RS)

Posted 06 September 2010 - 01:30 PM

well, in fact, in that log there's a couple of things that really doesn't affect the unofficial issue. as an sample, that _old folder and an old version of the adobe reader script. so far i know, the things that may create that issue are changes in the translations folder and at the modules. other ones may not have any effect. of course, clean that is an idea...

[]s





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users