Status of Dot Net Scripts
#1
Posted 18 January 2012 - 03:05 AM
I know all that are corcerned with updating scripts are busy and have lives out the project but it would be nice to get information on the progress.
Not being pushy just inquisitive
Bruce
#2
Posted 18 January 2012 - 07:42 AM
There looks like there is a way on the script maintenance side if we remove all .net updates have you download Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5 SP1 and then add three update. but the total download comes to 231m for the .net 3.5 sp1 and 17m for the thee updates.
The .net 3.5 sp1 comes with .net 2.0 and all the updates to get both up to date.
edit: funny thing is... if I look at the x64 version for updates... all I need is 3 downloads for 138m
#3
Posted 18 January 2012 - 07:56 AM
Hope this helps
Bruce
#4
Posted 18 January 2012 - 07:59 AM
starting to wonder if I should split the release.list into x64 and x86 lists.
#5
Posted 18 January 2012 - 08:02 AM
problems with doing so.
#6
Posted 18 January 2012 - 08:16 AM
#7
Posted 18 January 2012 - 08:21 AM
#8
Posted 18 January 2012 - 11:38 AM
Could the dotnet script be made so that it downloads just the files needed for the os selected, or to separate folders under dotnet directory for each os if multiples are selected.Just my thoughts on the situation as it may make the directory a little easier to manage also the script(s).
Cheers
Bruce
#9
Posted 18 January 2012 - 11:40 AM
Im still deciding whether to split it into x64 and x86 scripts. The more time passes the more the downloads will come in both flavors and the more need to split the scripts.
Also... there are plans to create a new script structure that will make creating modules only take a few seconds a file instead of all this leg work there is to do now. The way things are now will be nearly completely changed.
#10
Posted 18 January 2012 - 01:39 PM
#11
Posted 18 January 2012 - 11:50 PM
Again thanks for your tiresome effort on this addon
Cheers
#12
Posted 19 January 2012 - 04:24 AM
#13
Posted 19 January 2012 - 10:58 PM
Cheers
Bruce
#15
Posted 21 January 2012 - 12:02 AM
#16
Posted 21 January 2012 - 12:23 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users












