ViroMan, on 08 April 2012 - 05:21 AM, said:
#81
Posted 08 April 2012 - 07:48 PM
#82
Posted 11 April 2012 - 09:24 PM
HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\{DA5E371C-6333-3D8A-93A4-6FD5B20BCC6E}
DisplayName: Microsoft Visual C++ 2010 x64 Redistributable - 10.0.30319
DisplayVersion: 10.0.30319
InstallSource: C:\ATI\SUPPORT\12-3_win7_64_dd_ccc\Packages\Apps\VC10RTx64\vcredist_x64\
New install of Win7 Ultimate w/SP1 32bit.
HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\{196BB40D-1578-3D01-B289-BEFC77A11A1E}
DisplayName: Microsoft Visual C++ 2010 x86 Redistributable - 10.0.30319
DisplayVersion: 10.0.30319
InstallSource: C:\ATI\Support\12-3_win7_32_dd_ccc\Packages\Apps\VC10RTx86\vcredist_x86\
Comments: Caution. Removing this product might prevent some applications from running.
As I posted above - new hardware and new software installations. I figured I'd try to see if I could find an explanation for the differences in the registry keys I have versus what is in the APM files. I have only started to install the software applicable to my new hardware; mainly Win7, motherboard drivers, sound system drivers, and video card drivers.
When I installed the latest AMD/ATI Catalyst Drivers for my Radeon HD 6970 video card the install routine also installed versions of Visual C++ as indicated above. These keys are NOT the keys defined by the AutoPatcher APM files and are why I was having slightly different results - as reported above.
So, I would have to expect that any and all future AMD/ATI updates could also result in different registry keys - and these keys may also mess with keys created by a previous or later install of the Visual C++ redistributables downloaded directly from Microsoft or installed by other programs install routines.
So, I would assume that future Visual C++ updates and/or AMD/AT updates and/or nVidia video updates ( I have no idea here as to their use of Visual C++ - I just mention the possibility) could have an impact on AutoPatcher ressults and reports.
I hope all this made sense - ask if necessary.
Off to finish insstalling things.
#83
Posted 12 April 2012 - 01:49 PM
#84
Posted 13 April 2012 - 02:35 AM
#85
Posted 13 April 2012 - 02:54 AM
AMD/ATI are always a bit behind with the version of Visual C++ as they utilize the latest version at the start of writing their software package, even if a newer is available at the time for release they don't rewrite for the newer version.
@DesertJerry.... just extracted the package for nVidia 296.10 and they don't use Visual C++, it's only AMD/ATI that do.
Edited by Whatacrock, 13 April 2012 - 03:03 AM.
#86
Posted 13 April 2012 - 09:35 AM
Previously, i just deleted the older versions, yet to my annoyance the odd install package would re-install the older versions.
I noted no compatability issues after uninstalling the older versions, IIRC.
This looks like a job for CCleaner!
currently using for x86:
- VC2005 SP1 KB2538242 Redistributable http://www.microsoft...s.aspx?id=26347 aka v8.0.61001
- VC2008 SP1 KB2538243 Redistributable http://www.microsoft...s.aspx?id=26368 aka v9.0.30729.6161
- VC2010 SP1 KB2565063 Redistributable http://www.microsoft...s.aspx?id=26999 aka v10.0.40219
#87
Posted 13 April 2012 - 08:40 PM
Opted to use Add/Remove Programs and uninstall Microsoft Visual C++ 2010 x64 Redistributable - 10.0.30319. Opened registry editor and confirmed key shown above was no longer shown. (This is/was installed as part of the AMD/ATI video driver installation.)
Proceeded to install from my downloads folder (not yet from within AutoPatcher):
VisualC++2005Redist_x64
VisualC++2005Redist_x64_SecurityPack
VisualC++2005SP1Redist_x64
VisualC++2005SP1Redist_x64_ATLSecurityUpdate
VisualC++2005SP1RedistMFCSecurityUpdate_x64
VisualC++2008Redist_x64
VisualC++2008Redist_x64_SecurityPack
VisualC++2008SP1Redist_x64
VisualC++2008SP1Redist_x64_SecurityPack
VisualC++2008SP1RedistMFCSecurityUpdate_x64
VisualC++2010Redist_x64
VisualC++2010Redist_x86_x64
VisualC++2010SP1Redist_x64
Verfied installation in Control Panel > Programs and Features.
Started AutoPatcher > Windows Addons > All Visual C++ x64 items blue; x86 items black. That to me would confirm my previous comments about the AMD/ATI installation creating a registry key specific to that installation and not the standard one created when the download from Microsoft is installed.
Started AMD/ATI Catalyst Control Center and no problems appeared - so it would seem it is not necessary to install the Visual C++ version that is part of the video driver updates.
I would. therefore, recommend that the user not install the Visual C++ version that comes with the AMD/ATI driver updates. Assuming all my results above are correct/valid and no one has a question the next item would be to install all the x86 versions of the Visual C++ runtimes/redistributables. I won't do the x86 installs for a couple of days - just in case someone has a question that requires an answer from within an x64 install only.
#88
Posted 14 April 2012 - 07:45 PM
#89
Posted 14 April 2012 - 08:37 PM
Performed same test as above - results verified - Autopatcher started and all Visual C++ in blue - so, again, not installing the AMD/ATI version is recommended.
#90
Posted 17 April 2012 - 02:24 AM
#91
Posted 17 April 2012 - 03:00 AM
#92
Posted 17 April 2012 - 08:40 PM
TechDud, on 17 April 2012 - 02:24 AM, said:
#93
Posted 29 April 2012 - 09:03 PM
A copy of the installer is placed in %windir% on Windows XP.
I replaced both x86 & x64 Visual C++ 2005 runtimes on the XP package.
Here is the runtime output on XP_x86 (from bcm_vc80redist.log in %temp%):
Quote
vcredist_x86.exe exited with errorlevel=0
[Apr 29 2012 12:55:36.96] END vcredist_x86.exe /q:a /r:i /c:"msiexec /i vcredist.msi /qn"
I am unable to test on WinXP_x64. Please post any test results in the DriverPacks forum.
I have a link to this generic 'experimental' pack at the bottom of the following post. --> http://forum.driverp...id=47764#p47764
The installer seems to be clueless of the changes. Remember to backup your wifi settings first (PW, etc.)!
Heck, backup all important data for further safety.
Edited by TechDud, 29 April 2012 - 09:17 PM.
#94
Posted 29 April 2012 - 11:46 PM
#95
Posted 31 August 2012 - 03:43 AM
Visual C++ Redist for Visual Studio 2012
Go here: http://www.microsoft...s.aspx?id=30679
#96
Posted 31 August 2012 - 06:20 AM
Derp forgot these only work on Vista and up. Something I lack. If someone has these and can give me the registry detection strings I can update the apm's and make them official.
Edited by ViroMan, 31 August 2012 - 06:28 AM.
#97
Posted 31 August 2012 - 08:03 AM
Install Source
C:\ProgramData\Package Cache\{FDB30193-FDA0-3DAA-ACCA-A75EEFE53607}v11.0.50727\packages\vcRuntimeAdditional_x86\
[DetectionRegistry]
RegistryPath=HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\{FDB30193-FDA0-3DAA-ACCA-A75EEFE53607}
KeyName=DisplayVersion
KeyValue=11.0.50727
Uninstall
"MsiExec.exe /X{FDB30193-FDA0-3DAA-ACCA-A75EEFE53607}"
Edited by Whatacrock, 31 August 2012 - 08:03 AM.
#98
Posted 28 September 2012 - 06:02 AM
Sorry if I jumped onto your toes VM, as you are busy with the upgrade of APUP V1.
#99
Posted 28 September 2012 - 09:26 PM
Whatacrock, on 28 September 2012 - 06:02 AM, said:
Now I know it will be tomorrow.
Edited by DesertJerry, 28 September 2012 - 10:03 PM.
#100
Posted 29 September 2012 - 10:12 PM
HKCR\Installer\Products\2B7A37F2E05E6A93A9CBFE984E6CE263
ProductName: Microsoft Visual C++ 2012 Minimum Runtime x86 - 11.0.50727
Version (Decimal): 184600103
HKCR\Installer\Products\39103BDF0ADFAAD3CAAC7AE5FE5E6370
ProductName: Microsoft Visual C++ 2012 Additional Runtime x86 - 11.0.50727
Version (Decimal): 184600103
HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\{22154f09-719a-4619-bb71-5b3356999fbf}
DisplayName: Microsoft Visual C++ 2012 Redistributable x86 - 11.0.50727.1
DisplayVersion: 11.0.50727.1
HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\{2F73A7B2-E50E-39A6-9ABC-EF89E4C62E36}
DisplayName: Microsoft Visual C++ 2012 Minimum Runtime x86 - 11.0.50727
DisplayVersion: 11.0.50727
HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\{FDB30193-FDA0-3DAA-ACCA-A75EEFE53607}
DisplayName: Microsoft Visual C++ 2012 Additional Runtime x86 - 11.0.50727
DisplayVersion: 11.0.50727
Win7 Ultimate 64bit w/SP1
HKCR\Installer\Products\2B7A37F2E05E6A93A9CBFE984E6CE263
ProductName: Microsoft Visual C++ 2012 Minimum Runtime x86 - 11.0.50727
Version (Decimal): 184600103
HKCR\Installer\Products\39103BDF0ADFAAD3CAAC7AE5FE5E6370
ProductName: Microsoft Visual C++ 2012 Additional Runtime x86 - 11.0.50727
Version (Decimal): 184600103
HKCR\Installer\Products\B8CF35CA81EEC9F3B9950639D7B081C2
ProductName: Microsoft Visual C++ 2012 Additional Runtime x64 - 11.0.50727
Version (Decimal): 184600103
HKCR\Installer\Products\BCA1BC2A2A49AB231AE5D70813F95798
ProductName: Microsoft Visual C++ 2012 Minimum Runtime x64 - 11.0.50727
Version (Decimal): 184600103
HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\{A2CB1ACB-94A2-32BA-A15E-7D80319F7589}
DisplayName: Microsoft Visual C++ 2012 x64 Minimum Runtime - 11.0.50727
DisplayVersion: 11.0.50727
HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\{AC53FC8B-EE18-3F9C-9B59-60937D0B182C}
DisplayName: Microsoft Visual C++ 2012 x64 Additional Runtime - 11.0.50727
DisplayVersion: 11.0.50727
HKLM\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\{15134cb0-b767-4960-a911-f2d16ae54797}
DisplayName: Microsoft Visual C++ 2012 Redistributable x64 - 11.0.50727.1
DisplayVersion: 11.0.50727.1
HKLM\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\{22154f09-719a-4619-bb71-5b3356999fbf}
DisplayName: Microsoft Visual C++ 2012 Redistributable x86 - 11.0.50727.1
DisplayVersion: 11.0.50727.1
HKLM\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\{2F73A7B2-E50E-39A6-9ABC-EF89E4C62E36}
DisplayName: Microsoft Visual C++ 2012 x86 Minimum Runtime - 11.0.50727
DisplayVersion: 11.0.50727
HKLM\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\{FDB30193-FDA0-3DAA-ACCA-A75EEFE53607}
DisplayName: Microsoft Visual C++ 2012 x86 Additional Runtime - 11.0.50727
DisplayVersion: 11.0.50727
Should be everything you need.
Edited by DesertJerry, 29 September 2012 - 10:14 PM.
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users












