Poll..Renaming Convention of Windows AddOns
Whatacrock
15 Sep 2012
As many of you may have there have changes to the format of the Windows Xp x86 and x64 releases as well as the .NET x86 and x64.
In taking this even further in a discussion would like for Windows AddOns to have a new title and giving the choices for members to vote and leave comments on.
So please vote and leave comments if you wise.
This poll will be active for 14 calendar days and see what transpire in the time space
Thank you for reading and please do vote
Edited by ViroMan, 19 September 2012 - 04:57 PM.
In taking this even further in a discussion would like for Windows AddOns to have a new title and giving the choices for members to vote and leave comments on.
So please vote and leave comments if you wise.
This poll will be active for 14 calendar days and see what transpire in the time space
Thank you for reading and please do vote
Edited by ViroMan, 19 September 2012 - 04:57 PM.
DesertJerry
15 Sep 2012
Microsoft Windows Augmentation
Augmentation: the increasing, or growth, of something in number, amount, size, strength, or intensity, or the amount by which something grows or is added to.
Encarta World English Dictionary page 110.
And, as necessary: Microsoft Office Augmentation
Augmentation: the increasing, or growth, of something in number, amount, size, strength, or intensity, or the amount by which something grows or is added to.
Encarta World English Dictionary page 110.
And, as necessary: Microsoft Office Augmentation
ViroMan
15 Sep 2012
I duno... augmentation is a big word and may not be abundantly apparent to other languages that it is, what it is but, utilities does and so does power and tools. I know those can be read by many non english and know what it means.
DesertJerry
15 Sep 2012
ViroMan
16 Sep 2012
well... its a lot of letters, no? lol well anyways my other point stands, I think.
Anyways included your suggestion.
Edited by ViroMan, 16 September 2012 - 02:28 AM.
Anyways included your suggestion.
Edited by ViroMan, 16 September 2012 - 02:28 AM.
Whatacrock
19 Sep 2012
Actually could count as 2 votes as DesertJerry's suggestion included.
I'm already decided on the issue and so to be neutral am reframing from voting.
PLEASE VOTE PEOPLE(It's not rocket science or brain surgery)
I'm already decided on the issue and so to be neutral am reframing from voting.
PLEASE VOTE PEOPLE(It's not rocket science or brain surgery)
click-click
19 Sep 2012
The poll is a bit broken. If you vote to leave as is, you get an error if you don't select what you want it renamed to.
_def_x_
20 Sep 2012
I vote for short, sweet, concise, and without redundancy 
It would be nice if the list had categories, then you could remove "AutoPatcher for" or "Addon Pack" from every listing - my $0.02.
It would be nice if the list had categories, then you could remove "AutoPatcher for" or "Addon Pack" from every listing - my $0.02.
Whatacrock
20 Sep 2012
@ _def_x_ ---thats is what we are trying to achieve by catergorizing the updates by Operating System, so far we have Windows XP x86, Windows XP x64, Dotnet x86, Dotnet x64..etc
Each OS has a critical, Non Critical and Components folder and child folders to each holding all the executables, however one exception to this is Windows XP which currently has 6 folders and 6 childs.
Autopatcher for has been removed on the work I have been doing hence the reason for the poll....the remaining catergories need new names for their homes.
Sorry if I have waffled on but just stating what has been done......
Each OS has a critical, Non Critical and Components folder and child folders to each holding all the executables, however one exception to this is Windows XP which currently has 6 folders and 6 childs.
Autopatcher for has been removed on the work I have been doing hence the reason for the poll....the remaining catergories need new names for their homes.
Sorry if I have waffled on but just stating what has been done......
_def_x_
20 Sep 2012
Sorry WAC, I'm not at all sure what your asking, at first I thought you were asking about the releases list, which is what I mentioned, now for the first time I see the word 'folder', so I'm guessing you're asking about the \modules folder layout, or both - I'm confused. Examples of 'old' and 'new' would be nice 
My opinion is meaningless, I haven't used AutoPatcher for so long I don't even know what you guys are doing anymore, and the few people I had been helping are using my friends app exclusively.
My opinion still stands - keep it simple, use their respective names, put it on paper first, see how it looks, is it logical, do-able. Maybe,
\modules
................ \xp_x86_enu
................ \xp_x86_ita
................ \7_x64_any
................ \adobe
........................ \reader
........................ \air
................ \directx
................ \extras
................ \dotnet
........................ \x64
........................ \x86
or according to language, something like,
\modules
................ \enu
........................ \xp_sp3_x86
........................ \xp_sp2_x64
........................ \office_xp
................ \ita
........................ \2k_sp4_x86
........................ \xp_sp3_x86
........................ \adobe_reader
................ \any
........................ \7_sp1_x64
........................ \vista_sp2_x86
........................ \directx
My opinion is meaningless, I haven't used AutoPatcher for so long I don't even know what you guys are doing anymore, and the few people I had been helping are using my friends app exclusively.
My opinion still stands - keep it simple, use their respective names, put it on paper first, see how it looks, is it logical, do-able. Maybe,
\modules
................ \xp_x86_enu
................ \xp_x86_ita
................ \7_x64_any
................ \adobe
........................ \reader
........................ \air
................ \directx
................ \extras
................ \dotnet
........................ \x64
........................ \x86
or according to language, something like,
\modules
................ \enu
........................ \xp_sp3_x86
........................ \xp_sp2_x64
........................ \office_xp
................ \ita
........................ \2k_sp4_x86
........................ \xp_sp3_x86
........................ \adobe_reader
................ \any
........................ \7_sp1_x64
........................ \vista_sp2_x86
........................ \directx
Whatacrock
20 Sep 2012
Sorry for the confusion _def_x_ .... the layout is similar to your first suggestion I didn't explain it very well.
Whatacrock
28 Sep 2012
Time is ticking people...tick tock....if you have any suggestions please vote and voice your opinion.



