Jump to content


AutoPatcher XP x86 Hotfix Depot


883 replies to this topic

#441 Cristiano

    Super Helpful Guy

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,851 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brazil (Santa Maria - RS)

Posted 10 August 2010 - 10:23 PM

preliminary replacement list:
replaced
KB982381->KB2183461
KB971468->KB982214
KB974417->KB983583
KB979683->KB981852
KB979559->KB2160329
KB975561->KB981997

[]s

#442 Cristiano

    Super Helpful Guy

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,851 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brazil (Santa Maria - RS)

Posted 11 August 2010 - 12:09 AM

well, the main xp enu script was updated. this is the changelog:
# 2010-08-10: +KB980436; +KB981852; -KB979683; +KB981997; -KB975561; +KB982214; -KB971468; +KB982665; +KB2079403; +KB2115168; +KB2160329; -KB979559; +KB2183461; -KB982381; +KB982664; -KB982632; ~kb890830 v3.10; ~registry detection for wmp11; -KB981332

tomorrow, the .net package, extras and start the ptb script...

[]s

#443 duxducis

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 1 posts

Posted 12 August 2010 - 09:14 AM

Hi,

After downloading yesterday and applying patches today I am notice that this is missing:

Critical:
http://www.microsoft...n/MS10-044.mspx

Important:
http://www.microsoft...n/MS10-045.mspx

I am new user and I am hope that I am on right forum.

Best regards,

#444 Cristiano

    Super Helpful Guy

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,851 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brazil (Santa Maria - RS)

Posted 12 August 2010 - 10:30 AM

those are office updates. they will be added, but Domenico is enjoying some well deserved vacations right now

but don't worry, it will be added soon

[]s

#445 JRosenfeld

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 107 posts

Posted 12 August 2010 - 10:54 PM

Problem with NET framework 11 August:

md5_checksum_for_DotNet_Addon_Pack.7z
File size does NOT match. Expecting 3989, but found 3986!!!

As a result autopatcher is unofficial, although all sets show true.

I deleted the md5_checksum_for_DotNet_Addon_Pack.7z file and ran apup again, same result. So I don't think it was a bad download.



#446 Cristiano

    Super Helpful Guy

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,851 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brazil (Santa Maria - RS)

Posted 12 August 2010 - 11:22 PM

no, that isn't the reason for the .net package goes unofficial. the script isn't signed with that file. but there's one issue: that file has the wrong size. i will do an download test with this new kb to check for possible download issues related to that

thanks

#447 Cristiano

    Super Helpful Guy

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,851 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brazil (Santa Maria - RS)

Posted 13 August 2010 - 12:44 AM

ok. i think that i've solved that issue. kb974417 was removed, but the script was re-downloading it. as this file shouldn't be present anymore, the release turns into unofficial. also, the file size issue was solved

thanks

[]s

#448 JRosenfeld

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 107 posts

Posted 13 August 2010 - 09:45 PM

Excellent. I deleted the KB974417 module and md5_checksum_for_DotNet_Addon_Pack.md5, then ran apup, which just downloaded the md5 file.

All official again, thank you

#449 _def_x_

    audi 5k

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,460 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 14 August 2010 - 09:46 PM

@JRosenfeld

Wouldn't this post be better served in the appropriate forum, not everybody will know to look in the XP forums for DotNet issues? <_<

You've been around here long enough that you should know this by now.

#450 JRosenfeld

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 107 posts

Posted 15 August 2010 - 12:26 AM

Sincere apologies. I was led astray by Cristiano's 'by the way' type of remark in post 42 'tomorrow, the .net package..'

#451 Cristiano

    Super Helpful Guy

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,851 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brazil (Santa Maria - RS)

Posted 24 August 2010 - 10:13 PM

i'm reaching august/2010 update for rootsupd.exe, but this one still didn't reached the static url (at least, the static link that i've tried still has the old version). i will keep on eye on it until tomorrow. if the static link keeps in that way, the script will be updated anyway, with the new link

[]s

#452 Cristiano

    Super Helpful Guy

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,851 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brazil (Santa Maria - RS)

Posted 26 August 2010 - 09:36 PM

done. the enu script was updated to include rootcerts 25 and also remove Windows Defender, that will be included in another script

[]s

#453 _def_x_

    audi 5k

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,460 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 06 September 2010 - 05:32 AM

Re: KB2183461 - I was installing a few updates on a XP SP2 x86 machine and I noticed this in the update log (btw, the update did not install and was selected once again in AutoPatcher)...

Spoiler
WindowsXP-KB2183461-x86-ENU.apm needs an edit - in fact IE7-WindowsXP-KB2183461-x86-ENU.apm and IE8-WindowsXP-KB2183461-x86-ENU.apm should be changed as well. If the update wont install on IE6, why would it install on 7 or 8. All 3 .apm files have - WindowsVersion=XP_SP2_X86,XP_SP3_X86.

Whatever you think is best :)

#454 Cristiano

    Super Helpful Guy

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,851 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brazil (Santa Maria - RS)

Posted 06 September 2010 - 01:25 PM

:) thanks. i will fix it today

[]s

#455 Cristiano

    Super Helpful Guy

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,851 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brazil (Santa Maria - RS)

Posted 06 September 2010 - 04:05 PM

done. i've also noticed in the log of the enu script that i'm late with an script. well, since we are in a holiday in here (in fact, the holiday is September 07, but...), i will try find some time to work on that later

[]s

#456 _def_x_

    audi 5k

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,460 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 06 September 2010 - 09:15 PM

Cristiano said:

done.
Almost :) There's a small issue with the script, the file name for 'MSIE Critical APMs' .7z is incorrect in the download link. The link produces an empty archive and the new .apm files are not extracted - the release becomes Unofficial. Note: the .7z's new size and hash are correct in the script - only the 'date' is bad. This is the fix,

...from
DownloadFrom=http://www.autopatcher.com/releases/english/win_xp/MSIE_enu_critical_20100606.7z
...to
DownloadFrom=http://www.autopatcher.com/releases/english/win_xp/MSIE_enu_critical_20100906.7z

The updated files are good - .rti, .md5, .apm, etc, their size and hash pass and the release is Official for Sept. 06, 2010.

#457 Cristiano

    Super Helpful Guy

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,851 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brazil (Santa Maria - RS)

Posted 06 September 2010 - 09:32 PM

always the little things... done

thanks

[]s

#458 Cristiano

    Super Helpful Guy

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,851 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brazil (Santa Maria - RS)

Posted 14 September 2010 - 07:51 PM

well, the "to do" list for this month:

edit: i was missing KB2141007. sorry

[]s

Edited by Cristiano, 14 September 2010 - 08:41 PM.


#459 Cristiano

    Super Helpful Guy

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,851 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brazil (Santa Maria - RS)

Posted 15 September 2010 - 10:47 PM

done. the xp enu script was updated with the latest updates. also, some parent modules was edited to fix some issues. details in the .script file or in the first post

[]s

#460 click-click

    I am not young enough to know everything.

  • Release Managers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 484 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 16 September 2010 - 12:36 AM

After downloading the English SP3 Update (Sep15) I got the following error:

***Downloading Releases***

Files to be Downloaded: 21
Download queue processed. Proceeding to next phase.

Download Error: Z:\Autopatcher\temp_bin\xp_sp3_enu.7z
File size does NOT match. Expecting 33238, but found 34238!!!

AP shows Official Release and the release info looks clean. Bad Hash somewhere?

Edited by click-click, 16 September 2010 - 12:49 AM.






2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users